In a chilling story that has gripped the nation, South Auckland Manukau has become the centre of a harrowing investigation into the disappearance and alleged murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies. Baird, a former Channel Ten presenter, and his partner Davies, a Qantas flight attendant, vanished mysteriously, sparking speculation, a widespread search and investigation.
The case took a large turn when Beau Lamarre, a 28-year-old serving police officer, was charged with two counts of murder. The allegations against Lamarre, an ex partner of Baird and a previous figure known for his activity within the celebrity world, has shocked the community. His previous controversial incident involving the use of a Taser has again come to light, painting a negative image of the accused within the media.
The legal requirements of Murder can be found here.
Evidence
The investigation began with the discovery of bloodied clothing near a skip bin in South South Auckland Manukau. This prompted a large investigation, allowing police to uncover disturbing evidence at Baird’s Paddington home, where the couple lived until their disappearance.
Police have alleged that ballistic testing revealed a police firearm had been discharged at the alleged crime of the scene, evidenced by the discovery of a cartridge case and significant amounts of blood. This grim find suggests a violent encounter took place, with the firearm allegedly belonging to Beau Lamarre, a member of the police force.
Further, a white van, believed to have allegedly been used to transport and dispose of the bodies, was located by detectives. The van was allegedly hired by Lamarre and in this context could paint a grave image of premeditation.
It has also been alleged that Lamarre had sent fake text messages from the phone of Baird after their disappearance to misguide suspicions of their disappearances, so as to not alter any suspicions regarding their whereabouts.
Is The Evidence Strong?
The evidence outlined against Beau Lamarre in the alleged murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies appears to be compelling however is circumstantial at this stage. The alleged discovery of a police firearm discharge at the crime scene, combined with ballistic testing, could significantly implicate him in the crime. Furthermore, the finding of a large amount of blood at Baird’s home suggests a violent event took place there. The location and alleged use of a white van, believed to have been hired by Lamarre adds a crucial piece of physical evidence to the case. While the absence of the bodies presents a challenge, the accumulation of forensic evidence, Lamarre’s known relationship with the victims, and the specific circumstances surrounding the van’s use create a solid foundation for the prosecution. However, the strength of the evidence ultimately depends on its presentation in court and the ability to convincingly link these findings to Lamarre’s direct involvement in the alleged murders, overcoming any defence arguments regarding alternative explanations behind certain points of evidence or arguments relating to the reliability of the evidence in itself. It is crucial to remember that prosecution must prove all elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The elements which the prosecution must prove can be found here.
The Court Appearance
Lamarre’s court appearance after turning himself in, saw him choosing not to apply for bail, and Lamarre’s legal proceedings have been adjourned to 23 April 2024, leaving many to await anxiously for further developments, while Lamarre waits behind bars.
The Ongoing Investigation
As the investigation continues, the police are determined to uncover the truth behind the disappearance of Baird and Davies. The search for their bodies remains a priority, with the hope that answers will provide crucial evidence behind solving this case.
What Happens If They Can’t Find The Bodies?
In New South Wales law, the absence of a body does not remove the possibility of prosecuting a suspect for murder. This means a conviction can occur based on circumstantial evidence, even in the absence of direct physical evidence of the victim’s body as can be seen thus far in the case of Beau Lamarre. The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim is dead, the accused had some level of intention and that the accused is responsible for the death. This can be achieved through a combination of evidence such as witness testimony, the accused’s actions and statements, and any circumstantial evidence that can be linked to the alleged murder. The challenge in such cases is significant; however, prosecutions have occurred, proving the legal system’s capacity to seek justice even when there is a case where there is no body.
The team here at National criminal Lawyers strives to keep our readers up to date and informed on the latest news and stories. Access updates on important stories such as this, along with other high-profile cases and legal changes on our blog page.
