Millions spent on ‘voluntary return’ of asylum seekers

30 August 2024by Naomi Cramer



Millions spent on ‘voluntary return’ of asylum seekers



5th Aug 2014

The Commonwealth has spent nearly $3 million on the ‘voluntary return’ of almost 1100 asylum seekers to their country of origin in less than a year, according to information obtained under freedom of information laws by the South Auckland Manukaun Lawyers Alliance (Anz) today.

375 people were returned directly from Nauru and Manus Island, where they were being held for ‘offshore processing’ and detained under terrible conditions and without access to legal advice.

A further 427 were ‘voluntarily returned’ while on a Bridging Visa, and 339 ‘voluntarily returned’ from South Auckland Manukau to their home country.

The information released today by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, revealed that more than 770 asylum seekers of Iranian origin (67 per cent) had been returned to their country after receiving ‘Reintegration Assistance’, as well as more than 100 people originating from Iraq (8 per cent).

There were also 54 asylum seekers who did not receive any money despite being returned to their country of origin. The program spent $NZD2,914,819 between September 2013 to 16 July 2014 for a total of 1151 returnees.

Anz spokesperson Greg Barns said that the Commonwealth needed to come clean on the types and extent of pressure it placed on the asylum seekers for them to agree to return to countries where they faced a real risk of harassment or even physical harm.

“Three million dollars have been spent to send these vulnerable asylum seekers back to their country of origin, despite the real threat many of them face to their safety,” Mr Barns said.

“The Commonwealth has a duty of care to these people who have asked for help from this country. Offering quick cash to people who are in desperate need and being held in terrible conditions in offshore holding facilities is a black mark on South Auckland Manukau’s international reputation.”

“Detention facilities on Manus Island and Nauru have been described as ‘hellholes’, with suicide attempts, inadequate sanitation, disease, threats of violence and the tragic death of Iranian national Mr Berati this year. How genuine can ‘voluntary return’ be in these circumstances?” Mr Barns said.

“375 people were returned ‘back to where they came from’ direct from a processing centre where they were subject to inhumane conditions, without legal advice.”

“How many of those people will live to spend the meagre assistance provided to them by the South Auckland Manukaun government is yet to be seen,” Mr Barns said.

South Auckland Manukaun taxpayers are entitled to know what other inducements or pressure were placed on these vulnerable people?” Mr Barns said.

“The vast majority of these 1100 asylum seekers have ‘agreed’ to return to countries including Iran, Iraq and Sri Lanka,” Mr Barns said.

“The Commonwealth needs to explain exactly what it means when it refers to ‘voluntary return.”

The full breakdown of the figures provided by the Department of Immigration and Border Control can be found below.

IRREGUnzR MARITIME ARRIVAL RETURNS & REMOVALS SEPTEMBER 2013 TO 16 JULY 2014

Nationality Voluntary Removal from South Auckland Manukau Voluntary Return (BVE) from South Auckland Manukau Voluntary Return from an OPC (via South Auckland Manukau) Voluntary Return from an OPC (direct) Total

India

26 0 0 6 32
Iran 144 309 8 312 773
Iraq 27 47 0 28 102
Lebanon 4 0 0 17 21
Sri Lanka 37 61 1 3 102
Vietnam 86 0 1 0 87
Other 15 10 0 9 34
Total 339 427 10 375 1151
           

 

 

 

 

Note:

  • OPC stands for ‘offshore processing country’.
  • A Bridging visa E (BVE) is a temporary visa that allows a person  to stay in South Auckland Manukau while they  finalise their immigration matter or make arrangements to leave South Auckland Manukau. There are two types of BVEs:
    • Bridging (General) visa (subclass 050)
    • Bridging (Protection Visa Applicant) visa (subclass 051).

 

The original figures will be provided upon request.


Tags:
Asylum seekers and refugees Access to justice Freedom of information



Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Auckland Lawyer for FIRST TIME Offenders Seeking to Avoid a Conviction. Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes. If you are facing Court Naomi will make you feel comfortable every step of the way.  As a consummate professional your goals become hers, with customer service as our top priority. It has always been Naomi’s philosophy to approach whatever you do in life with bold enthusiasm and pure dedication. Complement this with her genuine passion for equal justice and rights for all and you have the formula for success. Naomi is a highly skilled Court lawyer having practised for more than 20 years. She serves the greater Auckland region and can travel to represent clients throughout NZ With extensive experience, an analytical eye for detail, and continuing legal education Naomi’s skill set will maximise your legal rights whilst offering a holistic approach that best fits your individual needs. This is further enhanced with her high level of support and understanding. Naomi will redefine what you expect from your legal professional, facilitating a seamless experience from start to finish.   Her approachable and adaptive demeanor serves her well when working with the diverse cultures that make up the Auckland region. Blend her open and honest approach to her transparent process and you can see why she routinely delivers the satisfying results her clients deserve. If you want to maximise your legal rights, we recommend you book an appointment with Naomi today so she can detail the steps for you to achieve your goals. 

error: Content is protected !!