‘Like useless kangaroos’: Girl’s ex-lover remembers grisly woodchipper dying scene at homicide trial

October 19, 2023by Naomi Cramer

The previous lover of a lady accused of plotting one other ex-partner’s homicide by having him fed right into a woodchipper claimed to police the slain man was making an attempt to retrieve his cellphone when he met his grisly destiny.

Sharon Graham is on trial at Brisbane Supreme Court charged with the homicide of Bruce Saunders in 2017 after he died in a woodchipper.

She has pleaded not responsible to the cost.

Task Freelance Image Bruce Saunders died in November 2017 at a rural <a href=property at Goomboorian, close to Gympie. Image: Social Media” class=”css-12cetpi-StyledImage en5ut4d0″/>
Digital camera IconBruce Saunders died after allegedly being fed to a woodchipper by two males, procured by his former accomplice, in 2017. Equipped Credit score: Information Corp Australia

On Thursday, a 2018 police interview with Peter Koenig, her former lover, was performed to the jury the place he maintained he didn’t homicide the 54-year-old.

Describing the grisly scene, Mr Koenig stated: “You recognize what useless kangaroos scent like?”

LISTEN to the brand new podcast
Court within the Act

Contained in the courtroom with Tim Clarke.

Discover out extra

Within the footage performed to the court, detectives grilled him about how Mr Saunders may have died within the woodchipper, to which Mr Koenig claims the person was making an attempt to retrieve his cell phone when it was misplaced close to the machine.

Mr Saunders, 54, died after being dragged into an industrial woodchipper whereas clearing bushes at a property northeast of Gympie on November 12, 2017.

Sharon Graham (pictured) is charged with Mr Saunders’ murder, with the crown alleging she procured the two other men to kill him. Supplied
Digital camera IconSharon Graham (pictured) is charged with Mr Saunders’ homicide, with the crown alleging she procured the 2 different males to kill him. Equipped Credit score: No Supply

On the time he was working with two different males, Peter Koenig and Gregory Roser, fixing up the Goomboorian property for a just lately widowed lady seeking to promote.

All three males had been romantically concerned with Ms Graham, Crown prosecutor Todd Fuller advised the jury in his opening.

The jury was advised Mr Saunders was allegedly struck within the head with an iron bar by Mr Roser, falling unconscious, earlier than his physique was “gruesomely” disposed of within the woodchipper by Mr Roser and Mr Koenig.

Crown prosecutor Todd Fuller advised the jury all three males had been romantically concerned with Ms Graham.

The Crown contends Ms Graham counselled and procured Mr Saunders’ homicide by the hands of Mr Roser – her then lover on the time – as she stood to realize his $750,000 life insurance coverage coverage and the contents of his will.

Ms Graham’s defence barrister Peter Richards advised the jury that his client didn’t counsel or procure the boys to kill Mr Saunders.

In his opening final Tuesday, he urged the jury to pay shut consideration to Mr Koenig’s reliability and credibility as a witness within the proceedings.

“So far as Sharon Graham understood it, Mr Saunders died because of an accident,” Mr Richards stated.

Digital camera IconIn a recorded police interview in 2018, Peter Koenig (pictured) claimed Mr Saunders was making an attempt to retrieve his cellphone from the woodchipper on the time of his dying. Dan Peled / NCA NewsWire Credit score: NCA NewsWire

Throughout the recorded interview on February 2, 2018, Mr Koenig tells officers he final noticed Mr Saunders engaged on the aspect of the woodchipper earlier than he went via the machine.

He says he heard Mr Roser yelling “Bruce, Bruce” earlier than listening to a “change” within the sound from the machine.

Mr Koenig tells police he turned the machine off, seeing Mr Saunders’ legs within the machine.

One detective tells Mr Koenig: “The proof signifies there was an altercation behind the chipper (and) Bruce was put in.”

He’s requested about blood droplets on the underside of the woodchipper, with the detective stating a number of appeared to have come from a “vertical supply”.

“So Bruce has gone into the woodchipper, the place do you count on the blood to return from? What would trigger Bruce to bleed?” The detective asks.

“The chipper … the blades,” Mr Koenig solutions.

The detective then asks: “How do you clarify that blood, being in a pool, behind the tailgate of the chipper?”

“It suggests Bruce has been assaulted … and positioned into the chipper, by you, or Greg, or each of you.”

Mr Koenig denies there was any altercation, telling the detectives the droplets have been possible from a head damage Mr Saunders had sustained when a department fell on him.

“It doesn’t magically seem there,” one other detective asks.

“The ‘I don’t know’ is a bit arduous to take while you’ve bought a major blood sample.”

The detectives are heard asking Mr Koenig if he has any information of what occurred behind the woodchipper, to which he solutions he doesn’t.

He’s advised by the detective the model he’s giving is “not believable”.

Gregory Roser (left) pictured with Ms Graham. Supplied.
Digital camera IconGregory Roser (left) pictured with Ms Graham. Equipped. Credit score: Equipped

Later within the tape, Mr Koenig suggests Mr Saunders went into the woodchipper “after his cellphone”.

“You’ve made point out of his cellphone, have you learnt the place it’s now?” A detective asks.

Mr Koenig solutions: “It’s out at Sharon Beighton’s place … not all of it.”

The detectives query why he didn’t come right down to see emergency companies after they arrived on the property and provides his model of occasions on the evening of Mr Saunders’ dying.

“There was not a triple-0 name produced from Sharon’s place,” one detective asks.

“Why did Greg Roser ring Sharon Graham earlier than he rang an ambulance or police when a person is half-consumed in a woodchipper?”

The trial continues.

Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Auckland Lawyer for FIRST TIME Offenders Seeking to Avoid a Conviction. Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes. If you are facing Court Naomi will make you feel comfortable every step of the way.  As a consummate professional your goals become hers, with customer service as our top priority. It has always been Naomi’s philosophy to approach whatever you do in life with bold enthusiasm and pure dedication. Complement this with her genuine passion for equal justice and rights for all and you have the formula for success. Naomi is a highly skilled Court lawyer having practised for more than 20 years. She serves the greater Auckland region and can travel to represent clients throughout NZ With extensive experience, an analytical eye for detail, and continuing legal education Naomi’s skill set will maximise your legal rights whilst offering a holistic approach that best fits your individual needs. This is further enhanced with her high level of support and understanding. Naomi will redefine what you expect from your legal professional, facilitating a seamless experience from start to finish.   Her approachable and adaptive demeanor serves her well when working with the diverse cultures that make up the Auckland region. Blend her open and honest approach to her transparent process and you can see why she routinely delivers the satisfying results her clients deserve. If you want to maximise your legal rights, we recommend you book an appointment with Naomi today so she can detail the steps for you to achieve your goals. 

error: Content is protected !!