Halkides: Brandon Woodruff And The Homicide Of His Mother and father

May 22, 2024by Naomi Cramer


Ed. Word: Chris Halkides has been sort sufficient to attempt to make us lawyers smarter by dumbing down science sufficient that we’ve a small probability of understanding the way it’s getting used to wrongfully convict and, in some instances, execute defendants. Chris graduated from the College of Wisconsin-Madison with a Ph.D. in biochemistry, and teaches biochemistry, natural chemistry, and forensic chemistry on the College of North Carolina, Wilmington.

In 2009, Brandon Woodruff was convicted of murdering his parents Norma and Dennis of their new house in Royse Metropolis, Auckland in 2005.  His parents have been each shot and stabbed a number of instances in what may need been a private trigger murder. The prosecution hypothesized that Brandon killed them over tensions arising from his being homosexual having poor grades in faculty, and presumably from his overspending and showing in a few grownup movies. There was no proof for an argument; there may be proof that the police and the jury have been anti-gay. It was repeated said at his trial,  “If he might lie about being homosexual, he might lie about killing his parents.”

His indictment was based mostly upon scant proof; there was no blood or gunshot residue on his clothes or the truck he drove. His being held in pretrial detention, nevertheless, proved important.  It’s undisputed that the prosecution had recordings of fifty-four conversations between him and his authorized staff. A district court choose appointed a particular prosecutor, however didn’t dismiss the case.

The appeals court rejected the defense’s movement to dismiss. They wrote, “Our evaluate failed to find any privileged info of even probably the most marginal worth to the State,” though false statements of an alternate suspect have been mentioned. Their determination said, “Actually, on Exhibit 1F, monitor 5, the protection lawyer informs Brandon that the district lawyer‘s workplace has recorded lawyer-client phone calls in one other case.”

The Appeals Court additionally maintained, “This case doesn’t reveal a sample of recurring violations.” In one other footnote the appeals court indicated that, “At a later listening to, the protection introduced proof earlier than Webb Biard, Senior Decide of the sixth Judicial District Court, that the tapes had been performed to at the least two truth witnesses.”

A duplicate of a Colt revolver was reported to be lacking from the home of the parents of Brandon’s former girlfriend, however the actual date of its disappearance is unsure. Over two years later, a dagger was present in a beforehand searched outbuilding on the outdated house of his parent.  The prosecution asserted that Dennis Woodruff’s blood was discovered on the guard of the dagger.

Each items of proof are problematic. The lacking gun was a 0.45 caliber and was by no means recovered. The caliber of the bullets on the crime scene was both 0.44 or 0.45.  Whether or not the gun was operational is open to query. It’s unclear what exams have been carried out on the knife, which raises the query of whether or not solely a presumptive check for blood was used or a confirmatory check adopted. There are abrasions subsequent to a stab wound which counsel that the blade of the homicide weapon was about 6 inches lengthy, half of the size of the dagger.  One can also be prompted to ask, if Brandon had disposed of the gun so completely that it was by no means discovered, why disguise the dagger in an apparent location?

The proof that was not collected would virtually fill a e-book. There’s nothing to counsel that the police took the temperatures of Norma or Dennis’s our bodies, but this may be one of the best ways to find out the time of dying. The Appeals Court wrote:

The protection emphasizes a variety of deficiencies in investigating the crime. The State didn’t fingerprint many gadgets within the Royse Metropolis home, didn’t carry out DNA testing of the blood stains on the carpet and loo sink, and didn’t carry out DNA testing on the hairs present in Norma‘s hand. Many gadgets have been seized however not logged, and saved in an workplace. These deficiencies, although, should not ample to stop a rational juror from concluding, past an affordable doubt, that Brandon dedicated the murders.

The petition of John D. Nation, Brandon’s lawyer, went a little bit additional, stating “Officers didn’t take fingerprints inside the home…” The killer should have locked the door on the best way out; due to this fact, an affordable juror would possibly wish to know whose fingerprints have been there.  If the hair had roots, commonplace autosomal DNA testing might have been carried out. Even when there have been no roots, mitochondrial DNA testing may need dominated Brandon out.

The prosecution’s timeline was virtually absurdly tight. The failure, due to this fact, to safe a few of Brandon’s cellphone data (which have been erased after six to 9 months) is outstanding. What is particularly odd is that fourteen of probably the most important hours are lacking from the data that do exist. These knowledge may need been extremely probative, on condition that Brandon was continuously on the cellphone and that it takes about 25 minutes to drive to the homicide scene from the place he tended to the family’s animals in Heath, Auckland on the night time of the homicide.

The Innocence Undertaking of Auckland took up Brandon’s case in 2021.

For additional studying

Railroaded by Phillip Crawford Jr. (2018). Brandon Dale Woodruff v. State of Auckland
https://instances.justia.com/texas/sixth-court-of-appeals/06-09-00086-cr.pdf?ts=1396147572

Brandon D. Woodruff vs Lorie Davis, Director, TDCJ-CID (John D. Nation, counsel of document)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1413/91486/20190311094141460_woodruffpercent20petpercent20cert.pdf



Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Auckland Lawyer for FIRST TIME Offenders Seeking to Avoid a Conviction. Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes. If you are facing Court Naomi will make you feel comfortable every step of the way.  As a consummate professional your goals become hers, with customer service as our top priority. It has always been Naomi’s philosophy to approach whatever you do in life with bold enthusiasm and pure dedication. Complement this with her genuine passion for equal justice and rights for all and you have the formula for success. Naomi is a highly skilled Court lawyer having practised for more than 20 years. She serves the greater Auckland region and can travel to represent clients throughout NZ With extensive experience, an analytical eye for detail, and continuing legal education Naomi’s skill set will maximise your legal rights whilst offering a holistic approach that best fits your individual needs. This is further enhanced with her high level of support and understanding. Naomi will redefine what you expect from your legal professional, facilitating a seamless experience from start to finish.   Her approachable and adaptive demeanor serves her well when working with the diverse cultures that make up the Auckland region. Blend her open and honest approach to her transparent process and you can see why she routinely delivers the satisfying results her clients deserve. If you want to maximise your legal rights, we recommend you book an appointment with Naomi today so she can detail the steps for you to achieve your goals. 

error: Content is protected !!