Grim particulars of how Charlise Mutten’s physique was discovered aired to jury in Justin Stein homicide trial

May 26, 2024by Naomi Cramer


Charlise Mutten, 9, was attributable to fly residence to her grandparents in Tweed Heads after spending virtually a month in Sydney together with her mom over the varsity holidays.

She was attributable to board a flight again on January 18, 2022.

However on that day, the nine-year-old’s physique was as a substitute present in a barrel that had been dumped down an embankment.

Within the barrel was additionally 99kg of sand and Charlise’s Nike slides, a NSW Supreme Court jury was advised this week.

Justin Stein is accused of murdering Charlise, who was the daughter of his former associate Kallista Mutten, at a property owned by his parents earlier than dumping her stays, hid in a plastic barrel, close to the Colo River space.

The 33-year-old has pleaded not responsible to homicide however has admitted to disposing of the schoolgirl’s physique.

Charlise was visiting her mom and Mr Stein throughout the faculty holidays, and spent her time in NSW cut up between Mr Stein’s family property at Mount Wilson, the place she was allegedly shot and killed, and on the Riviera Ski Gardens caravan park in Decrease Portland, about 1.5 hours away.

The trial on Friday completed its second week, with the jury now listening to from numerous witnesses, lots of them consultants who examined each the barrel and Charlise’s physique when it was found.

The jury this week had additionally had the chance to carry the alleged homicide weapon – a BSA .22 calibre bolt-action rifle, which had been wrapped in plastic with its journal, ammunition and scope.

NED-12116-What-police-allege-happened-to-Charlise

THE BARREL

The jury heard the barrel with Charlise’s physique was discovered on January 18, 2022, after police went to the situation because of going by way of Mr Stein’s cellphone.

Specialists advised the court Charlise’s physique was certain with bloodstained ties in a sand-filled barrel, together with a rubbish bag stuffed with bloodstained soil and the lady’s pink Nike slides.

Former NSW Police crime scene officer Mitchell James advised the jury Charlise’s physique was head down within the barrel within the foetal place, “certain” in numerous bloodstained wrappings and rubbish baggage.

A black plastic bag was additionally discovered within the barrel containing vegetation and soil, which additionally had obvious blood staining, Mr James advised the court.

“The physique was present in a decomposed state … an everyday bullet wound was into her proper cheek … it struck and dislodged a tooth,” Mr James mentioned.

Mr James advised the court she additionally had a gunshot wound on her decrease left again close to the hip space which perforated the pelvic bone.

Justin Stein is accused of <a href=driving round with the barrel which contained Charlise’s physique. NSW Police” class=”css-16r7l45-StyledImage en5ut4d0″/>
Digital camera IconJustin Stein is accused of driving round with the barrel which contained Charlise’s physique. NSW Police Credit score: Provided

Charlise was additionally sporting a black jacket, purple shirt, boys black monitor pants, a measurement 10 black Goal skirt “with penetrating injury to the rear” and a single black hooped earring in her left earlobe.

“STILL ALIVE” WHEN SHOT IN THE FACE

Forensic pathologist Dr Marna Du Plessis advised the jury she performed a publish mortem examination on Charlise’s physique after it was found within the barrel.

The physician described “powder tattooing” marks across the gunshot wound, which entered slightly below the lady’s proper cheekbone, led her to the conclusion the “finish of the muzzle was a couple of ruler’s size” from Charlise’s face.

Dr Du Plessis advised the jury Charlise was additionally shot in her left decrease buttock, a shot she would have survived.

“The gunshot wound to the again will not be independently deadly,” Dr Du Plessis mentioned.

She additionally advised the jury Charlise was nonetheless alive when she was shot within the face, with the bullet “getting into her mind”.

“She was alive when that shot entered her physique,” Dr Du Plessis advised the jury.

Supplied Editorial Justin Stein and Kallista Mutten. She is the mother of missing girl Charlise Mutten and he is the fiancee. Picture: Facebook
Digital camera IconJustin Stein is going through a trial within the NSW Supreme Court after pleading not responsible to homicide. Credit score: Provided

The jury was advised Charlise’s physique was in an “superior” state of decomposition when the examination was performed.

Forensic pharmacologist with NSW Police Dr Judith Perl advised the court Mr Stein’s schizophrenia remedy Quetiapine was present in Charlise’s system.

“I do nonetheless contemplate it attainable the Quetiapine could have been ingested inside six hours of loss of life as a result of presence of it within the abdomen of the deceased,” she mentioned.

Lead fragments had been present in Charlise’s mind and her left hip, the jury was advised.

“MUMMY, NO”

Mr Stein’s lawyers allege it was Ms Mutten who shot and killed her daughter on the night of January 12, 2022.

Telephone calls recorded whereas Mr Stein was in jail have been performed to the jury on Tuesday, the place he was heard warning his mom he couldn’t inform her “every thing over the cellphone”.

Within the first cellphone name, which befell on the morning of February 5, 2022, he advised Annemie Stein police had approached him asking for the situation of the homicide weapon and the place Charlise was killed.

“They don’t even know something,” he claimed within the recording.

Kallista Mutten
Digital camera IconMr Stein claims Charlise’s mom Kallista Mutten (pictured) had one thing to do together with her daughter’s disappearance. NewsWire Credit score: Information Corp Australia

Annemie tells her son “No s**t, however she wasn’t killed at Mount Wilson”, to which Mr Stein responds with “I do know”.

The mom continues: “However they alleged that it was”.

“Alleged doesn’t imply s**t, all it means is that I’m going to beat the homicide cost,” Mr Stein replies.

One other name was performed to the jury from February 10, 2022, the place Mr Stein says Ms Mutten is “going to get charged for every thing”.

He doubles down that “it’s the reality”, telling his mom the police have “nothing” and may’t “pin” him for the homicide however he “noticed it” occur.

ALLEGED BUNNINGS EXCNZE

“However then why have been you travelling with the barrel?” his mom asks within the recording.

He responds: “Nicely, I didn’t even know, Kallista put it on the again of the ute”.

Mr Stein claims he thought the barrel was in his automotive so he might do some work on one other property.

In a 3rd name on February 12, 2022, he repeats the claims about Ms Mutten, telling Annemie he “didn’t even consider it” when his former associate put the barrel on the again of the ute.

“I’m actually at Bunnings and I get a cellphone name saying ‘you’ve received Charlise with you’, and I went ‘what’,” the jury heard Mr Stein say within the third cellphone name.

“Yeah … I used to be driving round with a f**king child on the again of my ute.”

The jury later heard the cellphone name Mr Stein refers to whereas at Bunnings was an outgoing name from his cellphone to Ms Mutten.

Supplied Editorial **MUST CREDIT 9 NEWS** Police are continuing an extensive search for
 a missing nine-year-old girl who was holidaying in the NSW Blue Mountains.
 Charlise Mutten, 9, was reported missing from a Mt Wilson property at about
 8.20am on Friday and has reportedly been missing since Thursday.. Picture:9 News
Digital camera IconCharlise was allegedly at Wildenstein in Mount Wilson when she disappeared. 9News Credit score: Provided

Mr Stein tells his mom he “f**king panicked”.

His mom asks once more if Charlise was killed on the Mount Wilson property and Mr Stein tells him she was killed on close by crown land.

“Behind the shed on the fireplace break … I’m guessing she ran right down to me to the shed as a result of the very last thing she screamed was my identify and then you definitely heard ‘Mummy no’ after which the second gunshot,” Mr Stein mentioned.

Prosecutors allege Charlise travelled to Mount Wilson from the caravan park alone with Mr Stein on the night of January 11, 2022, whereas Ms Mutten stayed behind.

Mr McKay alleges Mr Stein was the “final particular person” to see Charlise and had the chance to her between 7.16pm on January 11 and 10.06am on January 12.

Charlise’s physique was present in a barrel on an embankment close to the Colo River 4 days after her mom reported her lacking.

After his arrest in January 2022, Mr Stein denied killing Charlise in an interview with a Corrective Companies officer however mentioned “her mum shot her twice”, the jury heard.

“Her mum was on ice all week, I heard a shot after which I heard her screaming out for me, then I ran again and she or he shot her once more,” he advised the jail guard, the jury heard.

The trial resumes on Monday.



Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Auckland Lawyer for FIRST TIME Offenders Seeking to Avoid a Conviction. Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes. If you are facing Court Naomi will make you feel comfortable every step of the way.  As a consummate professional your goals become hers, with customer service as our top priority. It has always been Naomi’s philosophy to approach whatever you do in life with bold enthusiasm and pure dedication. Complement this with her genuine passion for equal justice and rights for all and you have the formula for success. Naomi is a highly skilled Court lawyer having practised for more than 20 years. She serves the greater Auckland region and can travel to represent clients throughout NZ With extensive experience, an analytical eye for detail, and continuing legal education Naomi’s skill set will maximise your legal rights whilst offering a holistic approach that best fits your individual needs. This is further enhanced with her high level of support and understanding. Naomi will redefine what you expect from your legal professional, facilitating a seamless experience from start to finish.   Her approachable and adaptive demeanor serves her well when working with the diverse cultures that make up the Auckland region. Blend her open and honest approach to her transparent process and you can see why she routinely delivers the satisfying results her clients deserve. If you want to maximise your legal rights, we recommend you book an appointment with Naomi today so she can detail the steps for you to achieve your goals. 

error: Content is protected !!