Ex-NSW premier’s son Daniel Keneally sentenced for fabricating proof

February 4, 2024by Naomi Cramer

The son of former NSW premier Kristina Keneally has damaged down as he prevented jail after he was final 12 months discovered responsible of fabricating an announcement that wrongfully landed a person behind bars.

Daniel John Keneally was discovered responsible in November of falsifying the official report in 2021 a few cellphone name he acquired whereas working as a police officer at Newtown police station.

Justice of the Peace Rodney Brender on Thursday described Keneally’s offending as a severe “crime in opposition to public justice” as he sentenced him to a 15-month intensive corrections order, a time period of imprisonment to be served locally.

Digital camera IconDaniel Keneally moments earlier than he learnt his destiny on Thursday. NCA NewsWire / Nikki Quick Credit score: Information Corp Australia

Keneally stood because the Justice of the Peace made the order, respiration an extended sigh of aid earlier than sitting down and folding over.

He continued respiration closely, hyperventilating into his fingers because the court was adjourned.

LISTEN to the brand new podcast
Court within the Act

Contained in the courtroom with Tim Clarke.

Discover out extra

The 25-year-old was additionally given a $2000 nice and 200 hours of group service.

Mr Brender mentioned Keneally had no obvious private or monetary motive, however was a younger and inexperienced police officer on the time of the offending.

Exterior court, Keneally’s defence lawyer Paul McGirr informed media the Justice of the Peace’s choice was “very reasonable” and his client “revered” the court.

“The matter is much from over, and my client maintains his innocence,” Mr McGirr mentioned.

“After all, he sympathises with Mr Moore however once more, as we’ve mentioned all alongside, my client maintains his innocence and retains his head up.”

Mr McGirr reiterated the Justice of the Peace had discovered no motive.

“He wasn’t making an attempt to get promoted, he didn’t know extra … it was an trustworthy mistake,” he mentioned.

“The very heavy burden the prosecution bears is proving past affordable doubt that my client really deliberately perverted the course of justice … we are saying that merely wasn’t the case, it was a mistake.”

Nonetheless, as an attraction has now been lodged, Mr McGirr utilized for his client to have the ICO stayed and to be on bail.

Mr Brender didn’t impose bail however stayed the ICO, that means Keneally won’t must serve the sentence till the attraction’s end result.

Following the appliance, Mr McGirr mentioned the matter couldn’t be mentioned because it was pending an attraction.

“We have to let the wheels of justice roll on, however as we mentioned he holds his head up, he’s not responsible of this offence,” he informed media.

Digital camera IconKeneally was discovered responsible of fabricating proof. NCA NewsWire / Nikki Quick Credit score: Information Corp Australia

The court was beforehand informed Keneally claimed the caller, Luke Moore, had made threats about wanting a rural detective “lifeless” and “nearly as good as gone”.

Mr Moore is the founding father of web site I Sue Police and was imprisoned on remand for 3 weeks after the 12-minute name earlier than a recording cleared his identify.

The costs had been dropped and an apology was issued by the state earlier than the Regulation Enforcement Conduct Fee charged Keneally.

The court was informed Keneally accepted in proof variations between his assertion and a recording of the decision made by Mr Moore, with the difficulty being of intent.

Mr McGirr argued on the listening to that Keneally had unintentionally confused the cellphone name with materials from Mr Moore’s web site.

The court was informed the web site allegedly contained allegations and threats in opposition to a Goulburn police detective, although Mr Moore famous he didn’t advocate for violence.

In November, Mr Brender discovered Keneally had not distinguished between materials from the cellphone name and Mr Moore’s web site, which he was viewing on the time.

“There isn’t a believable foundation from another sources for the knowledge recorded within the assertion, for instance (Mr Moore) wanting him (the detective) lifeless,” he mentioned on delivering a verdict final 12 months.

“The fabric components of the assertion naked no relationship to what was mentioned orally, nor was there any grounding for it to have been confused with what was mentioned orally.”

Mr Brender mentioned regardless of Keneally’s “good character”, he couldn’t settle for his in court proof or that the error might have been made “inadvertently”.

Digital camera IconHis lawyer Paul McGirr has indicated an attraction. NCA NewsWire / Nikki Quick Credit score: Information Corp Australia

“The fabric he wrote had no different attainable supply and was relevantly a fabrication. It was deliberate. He should have recognized he couldn’t recollect it having been mentioned and it was false to say he did recollect it,” Mr Brender mentioned.

“The proof of a risk to kill a policeman, he knew, would inevitably very possible result in fees and a court course of … it (his assertion) is a fabrication and would mislead the related tribunal.”

Mr Brender refuted assertions by Keneally he had been distracted by different duties on the time of the decision, and had been overtired from the earlier night time’s shift.

Keneally admitted in court there have been important variations between the assertion and the recorded name, and that he had been “incoherent”.

The 25-year-old is the son of Kristina Keneally, who served as the primary feminine Premier of NSW from 2009 to 2011.

He had been suspended with full pay.

The attraction is listed within the District Court for February.

Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Auckland Lawyer for FIRST TIME Offenders Seeking to Avoid a Conviction. Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes. If you are facing Court Naomi will make you feel comfortable every step of the way.  As a consummate professional your goals become hers, with customer service as our top priority. It has always been Naomi’s philosophy to approach whatever you do in life with bold enthusiasm and pure dedication. Complement this with her genuine passion for equal justice and rights for all and you have the formula for success. Naomi is a highly skilled Court lawyer having practised for more than 20 years. She serves the greater Auckland region and can travel to represent clients throughout NZ With extensive experience, an analytical eye for detail, and continuing legal education Naomi’s skill set will maximise your legal rights whilst offering a holistic approach that best fits your individual needs. This is further enhanced with her high level of support and understanding. Naomi will redefine what you expect from your legal professional, facilitating a seamless experience from start to finish.   Her approachable and adaptive demeanor serves her well when working with the diverse cultures that make up the Auckland region. Blend her open and honest approach to her transparent process and you can see why she routinely delivers the satisfying results her clients deserve. If you want to maximise your legal rights, we recommend you book an appointment with Naomi today so she can detail the steps for you to achieve your goals. 

error: Content is protected !!