Alternatives to Court for Financial Settlements in Divorce

31 January 2025by Naomi Cramer
Alternatives to Court for Financial Settlements in Divorce


divorce is a challenging time, and resolving financial matters can often add stress. While court proceedings are sometimes necessary, there are alternative methods available in Auckland and Auckland that can save time, reduce costs, and minimise conflict. In this blog, we explore the primary alternatives to court for financial settlements: mediation, collaborative law, solicitor negotiation, arbitration, and private Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR).

 

Mediation

Overview

Mediation is a voluntary process where an independent, professionally trained mediator helps divorcing couples reach an agreement. This approach relies on both parties’ willingness to participate and involves 3-5 sessions lasting 1-2 hours each.

Key Benefits

  • Typically, faster and cheaper than court proceedings
  • More flexible than court-imposed solutions
  • Less confrontational than court
  • Helps maintain better relationships, especially important if children involved
  • Allows creative solutions tailored to family circumstances

Process

  • Initial Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) required before court proceedings
  • Both parties disclose financial information
  • Mediator helps identify issues and explore options
  • Agreements recorded in Memorandum of Understanding
  • Still needs court approval via Consent Order to be legally binding

 

Collaborative Law

Overview

Collaborative law is an approach where each party retains their own collaboratively trained lawyer, and all parties commit to resolving issues without going to court.

Key Benefits

  • Legal advice throughout process
  • Direct negotiation between parties with support
  • Can involve other professionals (financial advisers, pension experts)
  • Often faster than court proceedings
  • Maintains control over outcomes

Process

  • Initial meetings to set agenda and goals
  • Series of four-way meetings
  • Full financial disclosure required
  • Lawyers draft legal documents
  • Court approval sought for final agreement

 

Solicitor Negotiation

This traditional approach involves solicitors negotiating on behalf of their clients through letters, emails, or meetings.

Key Benefits

  • Legal advice throughout process
  • No direct contact needed between parties if relationships strained
  • Can be conducted alongside other methods
  • Familiar process for most legal professionals

Process

  • Exchange financial disclosure
  • Solicitors exchange proposals
  • Negotiations continue until agreement reached
  • Court approval sought via Consent Order

 

Arbitration

Arbitration involves appointing a private judge (arbitrator) to make a binding decision on financial disputes.

Key Benefits

  • Faster than court process
  • Choice of arbitrator with relevant expertise
  • More flexible timing and venue
  • Private and confidential
  • Binding decision

Process

  • Both parties agree to arbitration
  • Choose arbitrator and agree terms
  • Exchange financial information
  • Hearing (can be paper-based)
  • Arbitrator makes award
  • Court normally converts award to court order

 

Private FDR (Financial Dispute Resolution)

A private FDR is similar to a court FDR but conducted privately with an experienced evaluator, such as a barrister or retired judge, offering an indication of the likely court outcome.

Overview

  • Similar to court FDR but private
  • Experienced barrister/judge gives indication of likely outcome
  • Not binding but helps guide settlement

Key Benefits

  • Earlier hearing date than court
  • Choice of evaluator
  • More time than court FDR
  • Private and confidential
  • High success rate

Process

  • Parties agree to private FDR
  • Choose evaluator
  • Exchange positions
  • Receive indication
  • Negotiate settlement

 

Important Considerations

When considering alternatives to court for financial settlements during divorce, several important factors should guide your decision.

Costs

The cost of each method varies significantly and can influence your choice. Mediation is one of the most cost-effective options, with fees ranging from £100 to £200 per hour. Collaborative law is more expensive, typically costing between £5,000 and £15,000 per person, but it offers the benefit of legal advice throughout the process. Solicitor negotiation costs vary widely depending on the complexity and duration of the discussions. Arbitration usually costs between £3,000 and £15,000, plus solicitor fees, while private Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) sessions are priced between £3,000 and £8,000, also excluding solicitor fees.

Success Rates

The likelihood of resolving disputes through these methods is another crucial consideration. Mediation has a success rate of approximately 70%, making it a reliable choice for many couples. Collaborative law boasts an even higher success rate, with 85-90% of cases resolved. Solicitor negotiation success rates can vary based on the dynamics of the case and the parties involved. Arbitration guarantees a 100% resolution rate since the arbitrator’s decision is binding. Private FDRs are also highly effective, with 65-70% of cases settling on the day of the session.

Choosing the Right Option

Selecting the best approach depends on your unique circumstances. Consider the complexity of your financial arrangements and your ability to communicate effectively with your ex-partner. Assess the costs involved and whether they fit within your budget, as well as the time constraints you may be facing. Privacy is another important factor, especially for those seeking to keep proceedings confidential. Lastly, evaluate your willingness to compromise, as some methods, such as mediation and collaborative law, rely heavily on mutual agreement.

Legal Requirements

Regardless of the alternative you choose, certain legal requirements must be met. Full financial disclosure is essential to ensure fairness and transparency. Seeking legal advice is highly recommended to protect your interests and navigate the complexities of the process. Additionally, any agreement reached must be formalised with court approval through a Consent Order to make it legally binding.

 

Exploring alternatives to court for financial settlements can significantly reduce stress during a divorce. By understanding these options and consulting with legal professionals, you can choose the approach that best fits your circumstances.

 

For more information, get in touch with Chadwick Lawrence’s family law team today.





Source link

by Naomi Cramer

Naomi is a highly skilled NZ Court lawyer with more than 25 years & is Family Law Expert in Child Care Custody Disputes.

error: Content is protected !!