Mental health issues can play a significant role in criminal sentencing. Whether you are facing charges or representing a client, it is important to understand the connection between mental health and criminal sentencing.
Mental Health Issues in criminal Cases
Mental health issues can impact a person’s behavior, judgment, and decision-making abilities. In some cases, mental health issues can lead to criminal behavior. For example, someone suffering from severe depression may commit an act of self-harm or attempt suicide. In other cases, mental health issues can be used as a mitigating factor in criminal cases. For instance, someone with a history of schizophrenia may have committed a crime while experiencing a psychotic episode.
Mental Health Evaluations
When mental health is a factor in a criminal case, the court may order a mental health evaluation. This evaluation can help determine the defendant’s mental state at the time of the offense, their capacity to understand the nature of their actions, and their ability to stand trial.
The mental health evaluation can also help determine the appropriate sentence. If the defendant is found to have a mental health issue, the court may consider a range of options, including treatment, probation, and community service.
Mental Health and Sentencing Guidelines
In some jurisdictions, there are specific sentencing guidelines for defendants with mental health issues. For example, in some cases, the court may order treatment instead of jail time. In other cases, the court may order a reduced sentence based on the defendant’s mental health condition.
The Court will more readily accept that issues of general and specific deterrence and not as relevant for those that suffer from psychiatric illness. Indeed the Court of Appeal has determined that a person suffering from severe psychiatric illness is not an appropriate vehicle for general deterrence.
[A] prisoner suffering from serious psychiatric illness is not an appropriate vehicle for general deterrence …
R v Tsiaras [1996] 1 VR 398 at 400
Mental Health as a Mitigating Factor
Mental health issues can also be used as a mitigating factor in criminal cases. If the defendant can demonstrate that their mental health issues contributed to their criminal behavior, the court may take this into consideration when determining the appropriate sentence.
For example, if a defendant with a history of bipolar disorder committed a crime while experiencing a manic episode, the court may consider this when deciding the sentence. The court may also consider the defendant’s history of mental health treatment, their efforts to seek treatment, and their willingness to continue treatment.
The court recognises that a sentence which involves imprisonment actually to be served may often weigh more heavily on an a person suffers from psychiatric ill health much as someone with a physical issue might find jail more difficult. The court will usually moderate the sentence to balance this factor.
Relevance of Mental Health
In the Victorian decision of R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 the Court held that serious psychiatric illness not amounting to insanity is relevant to the sentencing process in at least six ways.
1.The condition may reduce the moral culpability of the offending conduct, as distinct from the offender’s legal responsibility. Where that is so, the condition affects the punishment that is just in all the circumstances; and denunciation is less likely to be a relevant sentencing objective.
2.The condition may have a bearing on the kind of sentence that is imposed and the conditions in which it should be served.
3. Whether general deterrence should be moderated or eliminated as a sentencing consideration depends upon the nature and severity of the symptoms exhibited by the offender, and the effect of the condition on the mental capacity of the offender, whether at the time of the offending or at the date of sentence or both.
4. Whether specific deterrence should be moderated or eliminated as a sentencing consideration likewise depends upon the nature and severity of the symptoms of the condition as exhibited by the offender, and the effect of the condition on the mental capacity of the offender, whether at the time of the offending or at the date of the sentence or both.
5. The existence of the condition at the date of sentencing (or its foreseeable recurrence) may mean that a given sentence will weigh more heavily on the offender than it would on a person in normal health.
6. Where there is a serious risk of imprisonment having a significant adverse effect on the offender’s mental health, this will be a factor tending to mitigate punishment.
R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269 at [32]
This proposition has been adopted in a number of Queensland Court of Appeal decisions including R v Goodger [2009] QCA 377, R v Yarwood [2011] QCA 367, and R v Parish [2012] QCA 112
Conclusion
Mental health issues can play a significant role in criminal sentencing. Whether you are facing charges or representing a client, it is important to understand how mental health can impact criminal cases. A criminal defense lawyer with experience in mental health cases can provide you with guidance and support throughout the legal process. By working with a qualified lawyer, you can ensure that your mental health is taken into consideration when determining the appropriate sentence.
Disclaimer
This website contains general information about legal matters. The information is not advice, and should not be treated as such. You must not rely on the information on this website as an alternative to legal advice from your lawyer or other professional legal services provider. You should never delay seeking legal advice, disregard legal advice, or commence or discontinue any legal action because of information on this website.For specific legal advice you should immediately contact Gatenby criminal Lawyers on (07) 5580 0120.Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
